On Fri, 6 Oct 1995, Jon Drukman wrote:
quoted 8 lines Tony writes:> Tony writes:
>
> > But then there's a lot to be said for music that isn't technically
> > perfect in terms of compositional style, rhythm programming, or
> > whatever.
>
> oh i certainly have a LOT to say about that sort of music... how about "it
> sucks" for starters.
I guess live TG sucks then. Well, you may think so, but they are
considered by many to be innovators in electronic improvisation.
95% of Fax sucks too then (I know some would agree this statement...I
don't!) since most of it is not compositionally "perfect." In fact,
there is little music being made these days that is compositionally perfect.
I like a well constructed rhythm track as much as anyone but there's more
to music than perfect programming.
I'm also wondering why I can never find anyone to sell me any of the early
B12 vinyl and the Prelude-Pt.1 CD if B12 "sucks." I'll gladly buy
any of these B12 items off anyone who thinks they suck (or even if you
don't think they suck I'll still buy them from you!)
quoted 5 lines I have yet to hear> > I have yet to hear
> > anything from B12 that I really dislike, and much that I like. If that
> > story about Warp turning dwn their latest album is really true that would
> > be very sad indeed as some of Warp's output pales in comparison to works
> > B12 has produced.
g303 wrote:
=Eh? Warp most certainly have not turned down B12 latest.
=And if you had been
=reading IDM you should know this as I have, of late, mentioned it's imminent
=release several times.
I missed those posts, thanks for the correction. It's hard to read every
post with the volume I get sometimes. There was quite a bit of
discussion a little while back about Warp turning down their latest.
Glad to hear it's coming out.
Tony